检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨志壮[1]
机构地区:[1]山东政法学院刑事司法学院,山东济南250014
出 处:《齐鲁学刊》2013年第3期91-99,共9页Qilu Journal
摘 要:多阶与多元法律规范的立法模式,需要重新审视公法与私法的立法技术趋同性。公司法中的契约要素集中体现于公司法的私法性质,私法中的意思自治原则贯穿于公司法的始终。但现代国家私法层面的立法并不排斥任何公权力的介入,包括宪法规范力的适度渗透。借助公权力来保护社会公共利益,是公司法律规范兼有公法性质的理论基石。因此,公司法结构中的法律责任规范系公法责任与私法责任的有机统一,而权利受损主体寻求公法上的救济亦是公司法的应有品性之一。Multiple law legislation pattern,need to re-examine the public law and private law legislation technology convergence.The contract elements in the company law embodies in the company law of the nature of private law,and the private law autonomy principle goes throughout the company law all the time.However,the modern state law dimension of the legislation does not exclude any public power intervention,including the constitution of moderate permeability.With the help of the public power to protect the public interests of the society is the foundation of the company law that it is has the nature of public law theory.Therefore,the company law responsibility is an organic unity in public liability and private liability,and the subject of rights for public relief is also the character of the company law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222