检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学护理学院,上海200032
出 处:《护理学杂志》2013年第11期86-89,共4页
基 金:复旦大学护理学院护理科研基金资助项目(FNSF201105)
摘 要:目的了解国内护理临床能力评价研究现状。方法对中国知网、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库在2012年7月以前收录的护理临床能力评价文献进行检索和归纳分析。结果国内护理临床能力评价研究文献始于1994年;评价对象涉及广泛,尤以专门针对本科生能力评价的文献占59.7%;83.1%的文献为研究性论文,其内容以评价体系研究(55.8%)和评价实践(22.1%)为主,评价实践所采用的方法包括问卷调查、OSCE及其他考核形式,研究所使用的术语尚不统一;文献的来源机构呈现出一定的集中趋势。结论我国护理临床能力评价研究尚处在起步阶段,当前需进一步规范概念的使用,根据不同护理教育层次学生的培养目标研究针对性的评价体系,并继续探索有效的评价方法。Objective To explore domestic research status of nursing clinical competence assessment. Methods Relevant literatures on nursing clinical competence assessment published before July 2012 were retrieved from the databases of CNKI, Wanfang and CMB, and analyzed. Results Literatures on nursing clinical competence assessment debuted in 1994. A wide range of assessment objects were covered, with 59.7% of the literature focusing on undergraduate students; 83.1% of the literature were research studies, which mainly focus on assessment system(55.8%) and practice(22.1%). Methods used in assessment included questionnaire sur- veys, OSCE and other forms, with some terms being used inconsistently. Research institutes of these literature showed some cen- tral trend. Conclusion Domestic research on nursing clinical competence assessment is still in its infancy. Use of the concepts should be standardized, assessment system should be developed according to different training goals of objects. Methods of assessment need further exploration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.136.226