检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学口腔医学院口腔正畸科,西安710032
出 处:《实用口腔医学杂志》2013年第3期380-384,共5页Journal of Practical Stomatology
摘 要:目的:了解功能性安氏Ⅲ类错患者正畸治疗前牙尖交错位(ICP)、后退接触位(RCP)时头影测量数据的差异及其对治疗前诊断的意义。方法:选取25位功能性安氏Ⅲ类错患者,拍摄ICP、RCP位头颅定位侧位片各一张,对侧位片进行测量研究。结果:牙尖交错位、后退接触位时∠ANB有显著统计学差异,同时∠SNB、∠SND、∠SNPog、∠U1-L1、Wits、面角、颌凸角、上下齿槽座角、下颌平面角、Y轴角、Z角和TWEED分析法中FMA均有统计学差异。结论:正畸治疗前对功能性安氏Ⅲ类患者牙尖交错位、后退接触位差异检查对诊断有重要意义。Objective: To study the difference of cephalometric tracing between intercuspal position(ICP) and retruded contact posi- tion(RCP) in patients with functional Angle Class Ⅲ malocclusion before orthodontic treatment. Methods: 25 functional Class m malocclusion patients were included. Lateral cephalographs were taken in ICP and RCP positions for cephalometric analysis. Results: The difference of∠ANB, ∠ SNB,∠SND, ∠ SNPog, ∠U1- L1,Wits, facial angle, angle of convexity, mandibular plane angle, Y ax- is, Z angle and FMA between the two positions was significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: Attention should be paid for the cephalomet- ric discrepancy between ICP and RCP for diagnosis of functional classⅢ malocclusion.
关 键 词:功能性安氏Ⅲ类错[牙合] 牙尖交错位 后退接触位
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222