检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京军区总医院 [2]北京军区北京药品器材供应站,北京100700 [3]第二军医大学药学院,上海200433
出 处:《药学实践杂志》2013年第3期238-239,共2页Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice
摘 要:目的为我国正在实施的药品电子监管提供借鉴和参考。方法收集相关法规、报道和研究文献,分析美国FDA和州药品局在推行药品电子谱系过程中遇到的问题及原因。结果州药品局与FDA在技术方案、技术标准、预期效果、执行期限上存在分歧,医药企业则在应用效果、成本增加、信息共享、政策风险上对方案施行存有疑虑。结论修订技术标准,明确信息传递规则,暂缓行政追责,消除行业恐慌,是当前我国推行药品电子监管系统应予以重视和考虑解决的问题。Objective To provide a reference for drug electronic supervision being implemented in China. Methods the problems and the reasons for US drug administration to implement of drug e-pedigree were analyzed by induction the bills, reports and literatures. Results There were differences between states board of pharmacy and FDA of technical solutions, technical standards, expected results, and implementation period. Pharmaceutical enterprises had doubts about program in the practical application, increasing costs, information sharing, and policy risks of drug e-pedigree. Conclusion Revising standards, definite of information transmission rules, suspension of holding accountable, and eliminating panic in the pharmacy industry, which should be valued and addressed as matter of priority in the process of implement drug electronic supervision by Chinese drug administration agencies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68