论自由证明规则的构建  

Construction of Free Proof Rules

作　　者：周成泓[1] 廖荣兴[2] 

机构地区：[1]广东商学院,广东广州510320 [2]江西警察学院,江西南昌330100

出　　处：《湖南警察学院学报》2013年第2期37-42,共6页Journal of Hunan Police Academy

基　　金：教育部人文社科青年项目"医疗损害责任诉讼中的证明责任研究"(项目编号:10YJC820175)

摘　　要：刑诉法的修正和刑事司法实践中诉讼证明的乱象要求完善我国的自由证明规则。自由证明的核心内涵是不受证据方法和调查程序的严格制约,其价值在于缓和严格证明的僵硬性及平衡个人权利与国家利益。自由证明的适用对象包括程序法事实、法律法规与经验法则以及量刑事实,自由证明也广泛适用于简易程序和决定程序中。在证据方法的限制方面,自由证明的证据关联性可以较为灵活,不要求最佳证据,容许传闻证据,执行较为宽松的证据排除规则。自由证明程序可以不奉行直接原则和当事人公开原则,但也要遵守宪法和刑事诉讼基本原则,注重保障被告人的权利。自由证明的内涵具有发展性,应当注重具体证据规则的构建。china＇s free proof rules need to be perfected by the amendment of Criminal Procedure Code and chaos criminal justice practice.The core substance of free proof is that no restriction made by strict constraints of evidence approach and investigation procedures,and its value is easing rigidity of strict proof and balancing individual rights and national interests.Applicable objects of free proof include procedures facts,laws,empirical rules,sentencing facts,and is also widely applied to summary and decision processes.In limitation of evidence approach,relevance of evidence can be more flexible,best evidence is not required,adoption of hearsay evidence allowed,and more lenient evidence exclusion rules.Free proof can not follow direct principle and principle of openness to the parties,but it should also comply with Constitution and basic principles of criminal justice,and focus on protection of rights of the accused.The connotation of free proof has been developing,and we should focus on building of specific evidence rules.

关 键 词：自由证明 严格证明 适用对象 证据方法 证据调查程序 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]