机构地区:[1]第三军医大学新桥医院普通外科,重庆400037
出 处:《中华消化外科杂志》2013年第6期465-468,共4页Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
基 金:国家自然科学基金重大国际合作项目(81020108023);国家自然科学基金面上项目(30973113、81272078);重庆市科委国际合作重点项目(201110008),
摘 要:目的探讨Hedgehog(Hh)信号通路在缺氧肠上皮屏障功能调控的作用。方法大鼠小肠上皮细胞系IEC-6细胞分为3组:常氧组(21%氧浓度)、缺氧组(2%氧浓度)、缺氧+环巴胺组(用5mmol/L的环巴胺预处理30min后,再给予2%氧浓度进行缺氧处理)。RT-PCR检测Hh信号通路IHH、PTCH、GLI-1mRNA的表达变化,电阻测定仪检测跨上皮电阻(TER),Westernblot检测IHH、紧密连接蛋白经典表达分子胞质附着蛋白(ZO-1)、咬合蛋白(Occludin)、闭合蛋白(Claudin-1)的表达情况。组间比较采取单因素方差分析,两两比较采用LSD-t检验。结果RT-PCR检测结果表明:常氧组Hh信号通路IHH、PTCH、GLI-1mRNA的相对表达量分别为0.056±0.009、0.459±0.087、0.142±0.023;缺氧组分别为0.303±0.052、0.678±0.073、0.483±0.061,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=一14.05,一11.85,一6.52,P〈0.05)。Westernblot检测结果显示:常氧组和缺氧组的IHH相对蛋白表达量分别为0.39±0.06和0.91±0.15,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=一8.08,P〈0.05)。常氧组、缺氧组和缺氧+环巴胺组的TER分别为(134±5)Ohm/cm。、(100±6)Ohm/cm2、(118±5)Ohm/cm2,3组比较,差异有统计学意义(F=1.0d,P〈0.05)。与常氧组比较,缺氧组下降约27.7%(t=7.84,P〈0.05);与缺氧组比较,缺氧+环巴胺组回升约16.4%,但仍低于常氧组(t=4.23,P〈0.05)。常氧组胞质附着蛋白一1、咬合蛋白、闭合蛋白一1的表达分别为1.184-0.24、0.80±0.13、0.90±0.09,缺氧组分别为0.58±0.08、0.32±0.05、0.50±0.09,缺氧+环巴胺组分别为0.92±0.21、0.43±0.10、0.82±0.11,3组比较,差异有统计学意义(F=4.95,2.88,10.09,P〈0.05)。缺氧组较常氧组分别降低48.7%、40.0%、55.6%(t=12.86,Objective To investigate the regulatory effects of hedgehog pathway on intestinal epithelial barrier function under hypoxia. Methods The IEC-6 cells of rats were divided into 3 groups: the normoxia group (21% oxygen concentration), the hypoxia group (2% oxygen concentration) and the hypoxia + cyclopamine group (cells pretreated by 5 mmol/L of cyclopamine, and then exposed in an atmosphere with 2% oxygen concentration). The mRNA expressions of IHH, PTCH and GLI-1 were detected, and the transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) was determined. The protein expressions of tight junction proteins ( ZO-1, Occludin, Clandin-1 ) and IHH were assayed by using the Western blot. All data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance or LSD-t test. Results The relative mRNA expressions of IHH, PTCH and GLI-1 were 0. 056 -+ 0. 009, 0. 459±0. 087, 0. 142 ± 0.023 in the normoxia group, and 0.303 ± 0. 052, 0. 678 ± 0. 073, 0.483± 0.061 in the hypoxia group, with significant difference between the 2 groups (t = - 14. 05, - 11.85, -6. 52, P 〈0.05). The relative protein expressions of IHH in the normoxia group and the hypoxia group were 0.39 ± 0.06 and 0.91 ±0.15, with a signi- ficant difference between the 2 groups (t = - 8. 08, P 〈 0.05 ). The TERs of the normoxia group, the hypoxia group and the hypoxia + cyclopamine group were ( 134± 5 ) Ohm/cm3, ( 100 ± 6 ) Ohm/cm3 and ( 118 ± 5 ) Ohm/cm3,with significant difference between the 3 groups (F = 1.04, P 〈 0.05 ). Compared with the normoxia group, the TER of the hypoxia group was decreased by 27.7% ( t = 7.84, P 〈 0.05) ; compared with the hypoxia group, the TER of the hypoxia + cyciopamine group were increased by 16.4% , but it was still significantly lower than the normoxia group (t = 4. 23, P 〈 0.05). The expressions of ZO=I, Occludin and Claudin=l were 1.18±0.24, 0.80 ±0.13 and 0.90 ±0.09 in the normoxia group, and 0.58±0.08, 0.32±0.05 and 0.50 ±0.09 in the hypoxia group, and 0.92 �
关 键 词:HEDGEHOG信号通路 环巴胺 肠上皮屏障功能 跨上皮电子阻 紧密连接蛋白
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...