不同穴位组合治疗颈源性头痛临床疗效评估  

Evaluation of the Clinical Therapeutic Effects of Different Acupoint Combinations on Cervical Headache

作　　者：高明慧[1] 谢文霞[1] 廖文军[2] 张劲军[1] 郑瑞献[1] 谢凯 

机构地区：[1]温州医学院附属第一医院,温州325000 [2]温州市中医院,温州325000 [3]宁波市镇海区炼化医院,宁波315207

出　　处：《上海针灸杂志》2013年第6期499-501,共3页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion

基　　金：温州市鹿城区科技计划项目(S1115)

摘　　要：目的观察腹针加阿是穴与传统针刺加阿是穴治疗颈源性头痛的疗效。方法将60例颈源性头痛患者随机分为腹针加阿是穴组(治疗组)与传统针刺加阿是穴组(对照组),治疗后对两组患者进行视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测定患者疼痛程度,观察颈椎活动度改善情况,并进行疗效的对比。结果虽然治疗组总有效率高于对照组,但无统计学意义,说明两种方法都有效;两组治疗前后VAS评分比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);治疗前后颈椎活动度比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论两种取穴方法治疗颈源性头痛同样有效。Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of abdominal acupuncture plus acupuncture at ashi points versus conventional acupuncture plus acupuncture at ashi points on cervical headache. Method Sixty patients with cervical vertigo were randomly allocated to abdominal acupuncture plus acupuncture at ashi points （treatment） group and conventional acupuncture plus acupuncture at ashi points （control） group. After treatment, pain severity and cervical spine mobility were measured using the Visual Analogue Scale （VAS） in the two groups and the therapeutic effects were compared between them. Result Although the total efficacy rate was higher in the treatment group than in the control group, there was no statistically significant difference, indicating that both methods were effective. There were statistically significant pre-/post-treatment differences in the VAS score （P〈0.01） and cervical spine mobility （P〈0.01） in the two groups. Conclusion The two methods of selecting acupoints have the same therapeutic effects on cervical headache.

关 键 词：头痛 针刺 颈椎病 腹针 穴 阿是 电针 

分 类 号：R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]