检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东大学外国语学院,山东济南250100 [2]上海理工大学外国语学院,上海200093 [3]同济大学外国语学院,上海200092
出 处:《外语与外语教学》2013年第3期6-10,共5页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基 金:2008年国家社科基金项目"叙述文体学理论建构与英美文学教学综合研究"(项目编号:08BYY032)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:认知文体学从20世纪90年代发展到今天,取得了很大进展,但是也存在几个亟待解决的问题:1、没有理清认知文体学与功能文体学的关系;2、没有理清文体效果的认知理据,对认知的体验性关注不够;3、没有建立有效的认知文体学分析框架。解决这些问题对认知文体学的学科发展非常重要,也有助于读者全面地了解并应用认知文体分析方法。据此,本文首先探讨认知文体学与功能文体学在理论依据、制约文体选择的条件、分析方法和分析程序方面的关系,然后探讨文体效果产生的认知理据,最后建构一个认知文体学的分析框架。Since its emergence in the 1990s, cognitive stylistics has made great progress, but there remain several problems urgently in need of being solved. Firstly, the relationship between cognitive stylistics and functional stylistics has not been clarified. Secondly, the cognitive motivation of stylistic effect has not been clearly explained, that is, not enough attention has been paid to the cognitive experiences. Thirdly, no effective cognitive stylistic analytical framework has been constructed. Solving these problems is very important for the development of cogni- tive stylistics as a discipline, and is helpful for readers to com- prehensively understand and use the cognitive stylistic analytical methods. So firstly, the present article studies the relationship between cognitive stylistics and functional stylistics in terms of their theoretical bases, constraints for the choice of stylistic fea- tures, analytical methods and procedures, then explores the cognitive motivation behind stylistic effects, and finally constructs a cognitive stylistic analytical framework.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43