Bicon短种植体临床效果1～3年回顾性研究  

A 1 - 3 years retrospective clinical study of Bicon short implants

作　　者：邓飞龙[1] 廖展澎[1] 吴少伟[1] 刘芹[1] 庄秀妹[1] 吴亚霖[1] 谢馨[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学光华口腔医学院,附属口腔医院,广东省口腔医学重点实验室,广州510055

出　　处：《中华口腔医学研究杂志（电子版）》2013年第3期50-53,共4页Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition)

摘　　要：目的通过对Bicon短种植体1～3年的回顾性研究,评估种植体存留率并分析相关影响因素。方法 2008-2010年,植入Bicon短种植体共21例41枚,术后3～6个月完成冠修复。采用Wheeler存留标准评估短种植体存留率,检测记录边缘骨水平变化、冠种植体比(C/I)、并发症等指标,分析种植体失败的影响因素。结果 21例41枚短种植体存留率100%,近、远中边缘骨高度变化分别为(-0.22±0.87)、(-0.15±0.66)mm,C/I=(1.47±0.13),按解剖C/I≤1、1<C/I<2和C/I≥2将种植体分为3组,各组间近远中边缘骨变化无统计学差异。结论 Bicon短种植体短期存留率与常规种植体无显著差异,具有良好的临床应用价值。Objective The aim of this study was to measure the survival rates of Bicon short implants and to analyze the survival related factors. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2008 through to 2010. A total of 41 Bicon short implants in 21 cases were evaluated. The results were evaluated according to Wheeler＇s survival criteria. Marginal bone loss, the crown-implant ratio （C/I） and complications were studied to analyze the survival related factors of the implants. Results The survival rate of the 41 Bicon short implants was 100%. The change of mesial and distal marginal bone was （-0.22 ± 0.87） and （-0.15 ± 0.66） mm, respectively. Average anatomic C/I was （1.47 ± 0.13）. There was no significant influence on marginal bone with anatomic C/I. Conclusion No significant difference in survival rate was found between Bicon short implants and regular length implants during the observation period.

关 键 词：Bicon种植体 短种植体 边缘骨水平 冠种植体比 

分 类 号：R783.6[医药卫生—口腔医学]