机构地区:[1]苏州大学附属第三医院(常州市第一人民医院)脑科学研究中心,常州213003 [2]常州市儿童医院
出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2013年第6期484-487,共4页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81101018,30870868);常州市应用基础研究计划资助项目(CJ20122016,CJ20112009)
摘 要:目的 探讨注意缺陷多动障碍混合型(C型)和注意缺陷型(Ⅰ型)儿童的认知受损特点及时间进程变化特征.方法 混合型24例,注意缺陷为主型20例,正常对照儿童24例,3组儿童分别完成2个Block时间段的持续性操作测试任务,分别对3组及block1和block2的行为学进行比较分析.结果 1.3组比较:C型和Ⅰ型击中数[(64.37±5.29)个,63.55±5.28)个]分别低于正常对照组[(67.04±2.03)个];Ⅰ型反应时间[(540.33±90.33)ms]长于正常对照组[(470.56±95.39)ms];C型和Ⅰ型反应时间变异性(ⅡⅤ)[(174.24±56.35)ms,(201.12±50.79)ms]分别高于正常对照组[(144.72±37.17)ms];C型1后其他数字虚报数高于Ⅰ型;Ⅰ型总虚报错误反应时间[(701.34±311.54) ms]显著长于C型[(512.57±279.22) ms],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).2.时间进程比较:击中数、遗漏错误数、ⅡⅤ的被试类型主效应显著(F(2,65)分别为3.08,3.08,6.87,P<0.05);击中数、遗漏错误数、反应时间、ⅡⅤ的时间进程主效应显著(f(1.65)分别为12.60,12.60,12.30,30.46,P<0.01);C型和Ⅰ型Block2的反应时间[(501.82±112.47)ms,559.33±90.73)ms]显著长于Block1[(473.19±106.43)ms,523.45 ±99.86) ms](P<0.05),而正常对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 混合型ADHD存在注意缺陷和冲动及反应抑制缺陷;注意缺陷型ADHD为注意缺陷及信息加工速度慢;ADHD的反应速度更易受时间进程影响,ADHD两亚型儿童的认知损害模式不同.Objective To investigate the cognitive impairment and time-on-task characteristics of combined type(C type) and predominantly inattentive type (Ⅰ type) of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder(ADHD).Methods 24 cases with C type ADHD,20 cases with Ⅰ type ADHD and 24 normal children were completed 2 Block period of continuous performance test task,with conducting a comparative analysis of the behavior results of three groups and block1 and block2.Results 1.three groups comparison:hit numbers of C type (64.37 ±5.29) and Ⅰ type (63.55 ±5.28) were lower than that of the normal control group(67.04 ±2.03) ; reaction time of Ⅰ type (540.33 ± 90.33) ms was longer than that of the normal control group (470.56 ± 95.39)ms; intra-individual variability(ⅡⅤ) of C type (174.24 ± 56.3)ms and Ⅰ type (201.12 ± 50.79)ms were higher than that of the normal control group(144.72 ± 37.17) ms.Commission errors of other figures after 1 of C type was higher than that of Ⅰ type; reaction time of commission errors of Ⅰ type[(701.34 ±311.54) ms] was longer than that of C type((512.57 ± 279.22)ms),and all the differences were statistically significant (P 〈 0.05).2.Timeon-task comparison:hit numbers,omission errors and ⅡⅤ had the significantly main effect of the type of subjects (P 〈 0.05) ; hit numbers,omission errors,reaction time and ⅡⅤ had the significantly main effect of time-on-task (P〈0.01) ; Block2 the reaction time of C type and Ⅰ type((501.82 ± 112.47)ms,559.33 ± 90.73)ms) were significantly longer than that of Block1 ((473.19 ± 106.43) ms,(523.45 ± 99.86) ms) (P 〈 0.05),while no significant difference (P〉0.05) in the normal control group.Conclusions C type ADHD has attention deficit and impulsivity and response inhibition defects.Ⅰ type ADHD has attention deficit and information processing capacity backward.Reaction rate of ADHD is more vulnerable to the impac
分 类 号:R749.94[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...