检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴姝欣[1,2] 周宗奎[1,2] 魏华[1,2] 鲍娜[1,2]
机构地区:[1]青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉430079 [2]华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室,武汉430079
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2013年第3期479-482,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:国家社科基金重大攻关项目(11&ZD151);国家科技支撑计划(2011BAK08B);教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(08JAXLX007)
摘 要:目的:探讨童年中期儿童同伴交往过程中的性别隔离现象及性别对同伴交往与孤独感关系的影响。方法:采用同伴提名、朋友提名和儿童孤独感量表对武汉市某小学3-6年级共509名儿童进行测查。结果:①童年中期的儿童,无论男女,受到来自同性别同伴的积极提名、朋友提名、互选友谊均显著高于来自异性同伴的提名数;而不同性别儿童在消极提名方面存在一致性,男生受到更多的消极提名;②逐步回归分析发现,对于男生来说,孤独感的主要预测变量为来自男生的朋友提名;对于女生来说,来自女生的积极提名能更好地负向预测女生的孤独感。结论:性别隔离现象存在于我国儿童同伴交往过程中,并对不同性别儿童的孤独感体验产生了重要影响。Objective: To test and verify the gender segregation in children's peer interaction in middle childhood and explore the impact of gender on the relationship between peer interaction and loneliness. Methods: 509 children from grades from third to sixth were assessed with peer nominations, friend nominations, mutual friends and Children's Loneli- ness Scale. Results: (1)The number of peer like-most nominations,friendship nomination and mutual friends from the same-sex peers were significantly higher than the number of those nominations from the opposite sex; However, Children of different genders have consistency: boys receive more peer like-least nominations than girls.(2)Stepwise regression anal- ysis showed that the main predictor variable of boys' loneliness was the friend nominations received from male classmates; while for girls' loneliness was like-most nominations from female classmates. Conclusion" Gender segregation also exists in the peer interaction process in china, which has a great impact on children' s loneliness experience of different genders.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38