检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医药指南》2013年第14期440-441,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的分析比较腹腔镜与开腹结肠癌切除术的疗效。方法选取我院收治的结肠癌患者行腹腔镜手术治疗的病例31例与同期行传统开腹手术的病例31例进行比较。结果传统开腹手术组与腹腔镜手术组相比较,手术时间、清扫淋巴结个数、术后并发症率和总住院费用,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术中出血量、肛门排气时间、术后吗啡用量、术后镇痛时间、术后住院天数,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论采用腹腔镜手术治疗结肠癌具有微创、术中出血少、住院时间短、术后康复快等特点。Objective To compare the effect of Laparoscopic surgery and traditional operation on colorectal cancer. Methods 31 LAP cases and 31 OP cases were compared. Results There were no significant differences on bperation time, the number of lymph node, the postoperative complications rate and total charge (P〉 0.05 ) , but the bleeding volume in surgery, anus exhausting time, dose of morphine, time of postoperative analgesia and hospital days were significant differences (P〈0.01) . Conclusion LAP has the same radical effects compared with OP in treating colorectal carcinoma. And the patients who taken it got little trauma and recovered quickly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229