李大钊对孙中山的“批评”述论——兼谈历史人物评价的正确路径  

Li Da-zhao's "Criticism" on Sun Zhong-shan——Discussing Simultaneously on the Correct Way of Evaluating Historical Figures

作　　者：李继华[1] 

机构地区：[1]滨州学院政法系,山东滨州256603

出　　处：《天津法学》2013年第2期107-112,共6页Tianjin Legal Science

基　　金：全国哲学社会科学研究基金后期资助项目"新版<李大钊全集>疏证"的后续成果;项目编号:08FZS004

摘　　要：李大钊在1923年10月所说"主张自由民主主义的孙文等人最近也变得与军阀没有什么不同",既符合李大钊自己对国民党孙中山的认识轨迹,也与中共中央文献和其他共产党人的有关认识相一致,更与共产国际、苏俄政府及其在华代表对孙中山的评价相吻合。孙中山自己关于国民党的失败教训及原因的论述,及其对于国共合作的复杂态度,实际上也证明了李大钊所作批评的合理性。当年的李大钊,对孙中山既有充分的肯定,也有严厉的批评,今天的人们应当全面看待这个问题,不能只注意前者,而不注意后者,更不能把后者简单地看作"偏谬的判断"和报刊的"文误"。In October 1923, Li Dazhao said, ＂Sun Wen who maintained liberal democracy has also recently become no different from warlords＂. It not only conformed to the track of Li Dazhao＇s understanding towards Sun Zhongshan and the Kuomintang but also was consistent with the CPC Central Committee document and other Communists understanding, more consistent with Comintern, the Soviet government and its representatives to evaluate Sun Zhongshan in China. Sun Zhongshan himself discussed the lessons of failure and the reasons of Kuomintang, and complicated attitudes for Kuomintang-Communist cooperation, which in fact also proved the rationality of Li Dazhao＇s criticism. Li Dazhao had both full affirmations to Sun Zhongshan, also severe criticism in those years. People today should take a comprehensive look at this issue, and they can not only pay attention to the former, but neglect the latter. We cannot even regard the latter simply as partial erroneous judgment and the error of newspapers and periodicals.

关 键 词：李大钊 孙中山 历史人物评价 

分 类 号：D231[政治法律—政治学]