国有经济、政治均衡与行业间的工资差距  

The State-owned Economy,Political Equilibrium and Wage Gap between the Monopolistic Sector and the Competitive Sector

作　　者：邓伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京财经大学金融学院

出　　处：《财贸经济》2013年第7期105-114,共10页Finance & Trade Economics

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金"转轨时期中国的国有经济与收入分配"(10YJC790042);江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金"转型时期的金融发展与收入不平等"(2012SJB790025);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)

摘　　要：本文从政治经济学的角度探讨了1998年后中国的垄断性部门与竞争性部门间的工资差距不断扩大的原因。1998年前,国有企业同时控制着垄断性部门和竞争性部门,为了平衡两个部门的利益,政府限制了垄断性部门的价格和利润;而在1998年后,国有企业基本退出了竞争性部门,政府偏袒垄断性部门,放松了对其的定价限制。在垄断性部门的定价水平高于边际成本的条件下,两部门之间的工资差距随着竞争性部门占整体经济的比重提高而扩大。实证结果表明,这一关系只存在于1998年之后。The wage gap between the monopolistic sector and the competitive sector has begun to widen since 1998. The article will explain it from the political economy perspective. There are a large amount of the SOEs in the monopolistic sector and the competitive sector before 1998. The government restricted the pricing power of the monopolistic sector to keep the balance between two sectors. After most of SOEs retreated from the competitive sector after 1998, however, the government relaxed the pricing power of the monopolistic sector because it only considered the latter＇s interest. If only the product price of the monopolistic sector is higher than the marginal cost, the wage gap between the two sectors will widen as the proportion of the competitive sector in the whole economy increases. The empirical model shows that the relationship exists only after 1998.

关 键 词：工资差距 垄断性部门 竞争性部门 垄断 政治均衡 

分 类 号：F276.1[经济管理—企业管理] F272.92[经济管理—国民经济]