论外资争议事项的不可仲裁性与我国仲裁管辖权制度的完善——以娃哈哈与达能公司强购案为例证  

Non-arbitration of the Foreign Capital Dispute Items and the Perfection of China's Arbitration Jurisdiction System——Taking Wahaha's Purchased by Danone Case as an Example

作　　者：周艳波[1] 庞玉石 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,南京210046 [2]徐州经济技术开发区人民法院行政庭,江苏徐州221121

出　　处：《商业研究》2013年第7期206-211,共6页Commercial Research

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"维护司法公正和社会公平正义研究";项目编号:10&ZD043

摘　　要：在娃哈哈强购案件中,外资方通过不当契约方式,借助于国际仲裁实现合约利益,凸显出国际投资争议事项的不可仲裁性被仲裁协议的契约性所掩盖,导致仲裁契约性对强制性规则的侵蚀,特别是对诉讼专属性管辖制度的侵蚀。因此,我国应完善仲裁法关于管辖权的规定,在协同化司法改革的大环境下,遵循国际仲裁契约性相对于强制性规则之服从的国际惯例,采取明示列举排除的立法模式,杜绝类似案件的发生。In the Wahaha＇ purchased case, the foreign party is with the help of the international arbitration for the con- tractual interests via the unsuitable way of contract, showing that the non - arbitration items in the international invest- ment items are covered by the contract of the international arbitration , resulting in the mandatory rule is eroded by the arbitration contract, especially to the erosion of exclusive litigation jurisdiction. Therefore, China should perfect the juris- diction regulation of arbitration law, follow the international customs that arbitration contract abides by the mandatory rule and adopts to the express list legislation styles to refuse the similar case to arise under the environment of the coordination judicial reformation.

关 键 词：争议事项 不可仲裁性 仲裁管辖权 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]