颈动脉内膜切除术对无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者认知功能的影响  被引量:4

Effect of carotid endarterectomy on cognitive function in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王波[1] 卜祥梅[2] 张奇[1] 马立新[1] 李泽福[1] 

机构地区:[1]滨州医学院附属医院神经外科,256600 [2]滨州医学院附属医院麻醉科,256600

出  处:《中国综合临床》2013年第8期834-837,共4页Clinical Medicine of China

摘  要:目的研究无症状性颈动脉狭窄(aCAS)患者接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)对认知功能的影响。方法26例经脑血管造影检查确诊的aCAS患者按颈动脉狭窄程度分为中度组(11例)和重度组(15例),均行CEA治疗。术前及术后6月通过简易精神状况量表(MMSE)、符号一数字模式测验(SDMT)、语言流畅性检验量表(RVR)及听觉词语记忆测验(AVMT)评定认知功能变化。结果术前重度组MMSE、SDWT、RVR及AVMT评分均明显低于中度组[分别为(23.12±3.29)、(25.45±3.06)分,t=2.873、P〈0.05;(11.63±4.11)、(9.35±4.60)分,t=4.716、P〈0.05;(13.84±4.02)、(12.15±3.87)分,t=3.960、P〈0.05;(15.60±3.25)、(12.92±3.38)分,t=5.058、P〈0.05];术后中度组MMSE[(25.45±3.06)、(26.24±3.85)分,t=1.681、P〉0.05]及SDMT[(11.63±4.11)、(12.36±4.57)分,t=1.470、P〉0.05]评分无明显变化,但RVR[(13.84±4.02)、(15.25±4.14)分,t=3.067、P〈0.05]及AVMT评分[(15.60±3.25)、(18.53±4.21)分,t=4.892、P〈0.05]明显升高;而重度组MMSE[(23.12±3.29)、(25.90±4.14)分,t=2.780、P〈0.05]、SDMT[(9.35±4.60)、(11.53±4.73)分,t=3.148、P〈0.05]、RVR[(12.15±3.87)、(14.80±4.22)分,t=3.852、P〈0.05]及AVMT评分[(12.92±3.38)、(16.08±4.15)分,t=5.149、P〈0.05]均明显升高。结论aCAS存在认知功能降低,CEA能解除颈动脉狭窄,改善认知功能障碍。Objective To explore the effects of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) on cognitive function of patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (aCAS). Methods Twenty-six patients with aCAS diagnosed by digital subtraction angiography were enrolled in this study. All patients were divided into moderate group ( n = 11 ) and severe group ( n = 15 ). Cognitive functions were examined before and after 6 months CEA. Cognitive function was assessed with the mini-mental status scale (MMSE), symbol-digital mode tests (SDMT), verbal fluency tests Scale (RVR) and auditory verbal memory test (AVMT). The patients' average scores were compared. Results Before surgery, compared with the moderate group, patients in severe group showed significant cognitive decline in MMSE, ADMT, RVR and AVMT ( ( 23.12 ± 3.29 ) vs. ( 25.45 ± 3.06 ), t = 2.873,P〈0.05; (11.63 ±4. ll)vs. (9.35 ±4.60),t =4.716,P 〈0.05; (13.84 ±4.02)vs. (12. 15 ± 3.87),t=3.960,P〈0.05;(15.60 ±3.25)vs. (12.92_±3.38),t =5.058,P〈0.05).After CEA,in the moderate group, MMSE ( (25.45 ± 3. 06 ) vs. ( 26. 24 ± 3. 85 ), t = 1. 681, P 〉 0. 05 ) and SDMT ( ( 11.63 ± 4. 11 ) vs. ( 12. 36 ± 4. 57 ), t = 1. 470, P 〉 0. 05 ) were not significantly different from pre-surgery, but RVR ((13.84 _±4.02) vs. (15.25 ±4. 14),t =3.067,P〈0.05) and AVMT ( (15. 60 ± 3. 25 ) vs. (18.53 ± 4. 21) ,t =4. 892,P 〈0. 05) rated significantly higher;and MMSE ( (23.12 ± 3.29) vs. (25.90 ±4. 14) ,t = 2.780,P〈0.05) ,SDMT( (9. 35 ±4.60) vs. ( 11.53 ±4.73),t=3. 148,P 〈0.05),RVR ((12. 15 ±3.87) vs. ( 14. 80 ± 4. 22), t = 3. 852, P 〈 0.05 ) and AVMT ( ( 12. 92 ± 3.38) vs. ( 16.08 ± 4. 15 ), t = 5. 149, P 〈 0. 05 ) score were significantly higher in severe group. Conclusion aCAS cause reduced cognitive function , CEA can relieve stenosis and improve cognitive dysfunction.

关 键 词:颈动脉狭窄 认知功能 颈动脉内膜切除术 

分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象