检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西大学商学院,广西南宁530004 [2]华中科技大学经济学院,湖北武汉430074
出 处:《兰州商学院学报》2013年第3期36-44,共9页Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71 173078;71003035;70803013)的资助
摘 要:利用国家统计局的工业企业数据库,本文考察了不同类型控制权转移对企业绩效的影响。具体而言,我们将控制权转移分为国有企业民营化(国退民进)以及民营企业国有化(国进民退)两种方式。其中,民营企业国有化的研究补充了前人文献的不足。以多种指标衡量企业绩效,研究发现:无论国有企业民营化还是民营企业国有化,在发生控制权转移之后,企业的销售成本率都有所上升,社会效益有所改善,然而企业创新能力表现不显著,资本性投资比例有所下降。总体上,在盈利能力、经营绩效以及成长性方面,民营化企业在转移之后表现得要比国有化企业好。Based on the Chinese Industrial Enterprises Database(2001—2005),this paper investigates the relation between firm ownership and performance.We split the sample into two groups;controller from the private - owned to the state - owned and controller from the state - owned to private - owned. Then we introduce different dimensions to evaluate the effect of transaction of firm ownership in;earnings, operation,investment,growth,innovation and social performance.Results based on fixed effect of panel data show that;no matter which kind of transaction of firm ownership,the new controller significantly increase social performances and firm revenues,however,the innovation and capital investment have not significant changes.In addition,we find that the increase of the profit,operation performance, and growth is more significant in the privatization firms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229