检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋振伟[1] 郭金瑞[2] 任军[2] 闫孝贡[2] 郑成岩[1] 邓艾兴[1] 张卫建[1]
机构地区:[1]中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/农业部作物生理生态重点实验室,北京100081 [2]吉林省农业科学院,长春130124
出 处:《应用生态学报》2013年第7期1900-1906,共7页Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2009CB118601);国家自然科学基金项目(31000693);国家"十二五"科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD16B14)资助
摘 要:在东北地区设置大田试验,研究不同耕作方式下玉米全生育期耕层土壤温度、土壤含水量、叶片光合性能及叶绿素荧光参数的变化特征.结果表明:耕作方式对土壤水热性能的影响主要体现在播种-拔节阶段,2010—2011年平地播种中耕起垄(PL)和全生育期平作(PP)处理0~40 cm土层土壤体积含水量在出苗期、苗期和拔节期比传统垄作(LL)处理平均提高5.6%和5.2%、4.6%和7.3%及3.9%和4.8%,苗期5 cm土壤最低温度分别比LL处理高1.4和1.3℃.由于土壤水热条件的改善,拔节期PL和PP处理的叶片净光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)等指标显著高于LL处理,而PSII潜在活性(Fv/Fo)和PSII最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)无显著差异,表明气孔导度和气孔限制值等气孔因素是导致光合作用差异的主要原因;灌浆期叶片Pn和Tr则以LL和PL处理显著高于PP处理,这主要是由于PP处理在强降雨时期经历了涝渍灾害,光合作用受到抑制.可见PL处理通过改善土壤水热条件增强了玉米光合性能,进而提高了籽粒产量.In 2010-2011, a field experiment was conducted in Northeast China to evaluate the effects of different tillage patterns on the temperature and moisture in topsoil layer and the leaf pho- tosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of maize. The effects of tillage patterns on the soil temperature and moisture mainly manifested at sowing-jointing stage. In treatments flat planting with ridging at early jointing stage (PL) and flat planting without ridging ( PP), the soil moisture content at the depth of 0-40 em was significantly higher than that in treatment ridge planting (LL) , with the increment being 5.6% and 5.2%, 4.6% and 7.3%, and 3.9% and 4.8% at emergency, seedling, and jointing stages, respectively. The minimum temperature at the soil depth 5 cm at seedling stage in PL and PP was 1.4 and 1.3 ℃ higher than that in LL, respectively. Due to the improvement of soil water and thermal conditions, the leaf photosynthetic rate (Pn) and transpiration rate ( Tr) at jointing stage in PL and PP were significantly higher than those in LL, whereas the PS Ⅱ potential activity ( Fv/Fm ) and PS Ⅱ maximal photochemical efficiency ( Fv/Fm ) had no significant differences among the treatments, indicating that the stomatal factors such as stomata conductivity and stomata limitation were the main factors inducing the photosynthesis differences among the treatments. Furthermore, the Pn and Tr at grain filling stage in LL and PL were higher than those in PP, mainly due to the high water-logging risk in PP in strong rainfall season. Consequently, treatment PL could promote maize photosynthesis through improving soil water and thermal conditions, and further, increase maize grain yield.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117