出 处:《中华眼底病杂志》2013年第4期411-415,共5页Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases
基 金:基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81060079);贵州省教育厅重点项目[(黔教科)2008034号]
摘 要:目的观察蓝光照射对人视网膜色素上皮(RPE)细胞L-型钙通道mRNA表达的影响。方法体外培养的第4代人RPE细胞按随机数字表法分为无光照组、光照组、光照+硝苯地平组和光照+(-)BayK8644组。(2000±500)LUX蓝光照射6h,终止细胞培养24h。光照前加入硝苯地平和(-)BayK8644,浓度均为1×10^-5mmol/L。荧光定量聚合酶链(PCR)技术检测各组人RPE细胞L-型钙通道α1c亚型、α1D亚型和α1F亚型mRNA的表达。结果荧光定量PCR产物α1C、α1D、α1F和内参8-肌动蛋白的cDNA逆转录PCR扩增产物长度分别为68、157、125、186碱基对,产物的凝胶电泳结果显示扩增条带位置与以上片段相吻合。荧光定量PCR检测结果显示,光照组、光照+硝苯地平组、光照+(-)BayK8644组α1CtuRNA的表达均高于无光照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);光照+硝苯地平组、光照+(-)BayK8644组α1CmRNA的表达均高于光照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);光照+(-)BayK8644组α1CmRNA的表达高于光照+硝苯地平组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。光照组、光照+硝苯地平组、光照+(-)BayK8644组d1DmRNA的表达均高于无光照组,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05);光照+(-)BayK8644组α1DmRNA的表达与光照组和光照+硝苯地平组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05);光照+硝苯地平组与光照组α1DmRNA的表达比较。差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。光照组、光照+硝苯地平组、光照+(-)BayK8644组α1FmRNA的表达均高于无光照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);光照+硝苯地平组、光照+(-)BayK8644组α1FmRNA的表达均高于光照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论蓝光照射可引起人RPE细胞L-型钙通道中α1C、α1D及α1F亚型mRNA表达不同程度的增高;1×10^-5mmol/L硝苯地平不能对抗蓝光对RPE细胞I,型钙Objective To investigate the effect of blue light on mRNA expression of L-type calcium channel subtypes of human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells in vitro. Methods The fourth-generation of human RPE cells were randomly divided into four groups including control group (no light group), light group, light + nifedipine group, and light + (-) BayK8644 group. The cells were exposed to blue light (2000μ 500) lux for 6 hours, and then cultured for another 24 hours. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction real time (RT PCR) and fluorescence quantitative PCR technologies were used to analyze mRNA expression of L-type calcium channel subunit of cardiac subtype ( 1C or CaV1.2), neuroendocrine subtype ( 1D or CaV1.3) and retinal subtypes ( 1F or CaV1.4) in each group. Results The length of PCR product of 1C, 1D, IF subunit and -aetin was 68, 157, 125 and 186 base pairs respectively. (1) 1C mRNA expression in light, light+ nifedipine and light + (-) BayK8644 group was higher than that in control group, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). 1C mRNA expression in light +nifedipine group and light + (-) BayK8644 group was higher than in light group (P〈0.05). 1C mRNA expression in light + (-) BayK8644 group was higher than that in light + nifedipine group (P〈 0.05). (2) Comparing with control group, 1D mRNA expression was higher in light, light -nifedipine and light +(-) BayK8644 group, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Light + (-) BayK8644 group was higher than light group and light + nifedipine group (P〈0.05), light group and the light + nifedipine group was not statistically significant (P〈0.05). (3) 1F mRNA expression in light, light q- nifedipine and light + (--) BayK8644 group was higher than those in control group, there was statistically significant (P〈0.05), light +nifedipine group and light +(-) BayK8644 group was higher than
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...