民事诉讼中的自由证明论略  

A Brief Study on Free Proof in Civil Procedure

作　　者：周成泓[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东商学院法学院,广东广州510320

出　　处：《河北法学》2013年第7期103-109,共7页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学青年项目<医疗损害赔偿诉讼中的证明责任研究>(10YJC820175)

摘　　要：民诉法典的修正和司法实践中诉讼证明的乱象要求完善我国的自由证明规则。自由证明的核心内涵是不受证据方法和调查程序的严格制约,其价值在于缓和严格证明的僵硬性及平衡个人利益与国家利益。自由证明的适用对象包括程序法事实、法律法规及经验法则,自由证明也广泛适用于非讼程序、决定程序和简易程序中。在证据方法的限制方面,自由证明的证据关联性较为灵活,不要求最佳证据,证据排除规则较为宽松。自由证明程序可以不奉行直接原则和当事人公开原则,调查程序可以简略化,但仍需遵守宪法和民诉基本原则,注重保障当事人权利及相关权益。自由证明具有发展性,应当随时势不断进行调整。It is required that China＇s free proof rules be perfected by the amendment of Civil Procedure Code and chaos civil justice practice.The core substance of free proof is that of not subject to strict constraints of evidence approach and investigation procedures,with its value be easing rigidity of strict proof and balancing between individual rights and national interests.Applicable objects of free proof include procedures facts,laws,regulations and empirical rules.Besides,free proof is widely applied to non-contentious procedure,summary and decision processes.In limitation of evidence approach,relevance of evidence can be more flexible,best evidence is not required,and more lenient evidence exclusion rules.Free proof can not follow direct principle and principle of openness to the parties,but it should also comply with Constitution and basic principles of civil justice,and focus on protection of rights of the accused.Free proof has been changing with times.

关 键 词：自由证明 严格证明 适用对象 证据方法 证据调查程序 

分 类 号：DF721[政治法律—诉讼法学]