海峡两岸商事仲裁制度对比研究  

A Comparative Research of Commercial Arbitration between China's Mainland and Taiwan Region

作　　者：王晓川[1] 夏兴宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院,北京100029

出　　处：《河北法学》2013年第8期29-34,共6页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：仲裁(Arbitration),尤其是商事仲裁,作为一种争议解决方式,与诉讼、协商、调解等其他纠纷解决方式在一般层面上有相似之处,但是,仲裁更注重当事人的意思自治因素,而且仲裁具备强烈的民间性特征。海峡两岸的仲裁制度都已经施行了很长时间,随着社会的发展和进步,两岸的仲裁法律都有进一步提高和完善的空间。通过选取大陆与台湾地区仲裁法律制度中的典型规定包括仲裁协议、仲裁机构、仲裁程序以及裁决执行方面进行对比,试图总结出两岸之间以及与现行国际趋势间的不同点,以及未来仲裁法律制度进步的方向。As a dispute resolution, commercial arbitration is similar with litigation, negotiation, mediation and other dispute resolution in the general level. However, it pays more attention to the autonomy of will, and it reflects obvious folk characteristic. Commercial arbitration has been practiced for a long time both in China's Mainland and Taiwan Region, and the legal systems need to be improved as the development of society. In this article, by choosing the typical provisions of the Mainland and Taiwan Region arbitration legal system including the arbitration agreement, the arbitration institution, the arbitration proceedings and the enforcement of verdict, the author attempts to summarize the difference between the two sides as well as the current international trend, and try to analyze the future development of arbitration law.

关 键 词：仲裁 海峡两岸 比较 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]