论我国知识产权侵权责任中“免予赔偿”规则的重新设定——以三大知识产权法修改为契机  

Resetting of the “Exemption from Indemnification” Rule in Intellectual Property Tort Liability in China——In the timing of the amendment of the three Intellectual Property Laws

作　　者：朱启莉[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学民商法学院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《河北法学》2013年第8期81-85,共5页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：中国法学会2013年自选课题<我国知识产权法定赔偿适用规则研究>;西北政法大学校级科研项目<我国知识产权法定赔偿制度之完善研究>(10XJC002);中国法学会项目<技术措施的法律保护--版权法及其超越>(CLS(2011)D45);国家社科基金项目<构建我国侵权责任法危险责任体系之研究>(09XFX013)阶段性成果

摘　　要：在我国知识产权相关法律中,关于免予赔偿条件设定得过于宽泛、模糊,将不利于权利人利益的保护,也不利于维护社会利益的平衡;各单行法之间关于免于赔偿条件的规定不相同,将难以形成统一的权利保护机制。应修正《无过错》的认定标准,统一各单行法之间关于《赔偿损失》的规定,通过严格限定免予赔偿的条件,加大知识产权的保护力度,提高权利人维权的积极性。Under Chinese intellectual property related laws, the conditions for exemption from indemnification were extensive and vague, which is disadvantageous for the protection of right＇s owners, nor to the maintenance of the balance of social interests. Due to that different special laws list different conditions for indemnification, it is hard to form a unified right protecting mechanism. The admission standard for ＂non-fault＂ should be amended, and the stipulations on ＂damages＂ should be unified among laws, and strict conditions should be set on exemption from indemnification, to strengthen the protection of IP rights, and to motivate the rights＇owner to protect their rights.

关 键 词：知识产权 侵权 免予赔偿 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]