从perfect 10v. Google案看临时禁令申请中的利益衡量——兼评我国《民事诉讼法修正案》第21条之规定  

The Interests Measurement of Application in a Temporary Injunction from the Perfect 10 v. Google Case——Comment on the Article 21 provision of Civil Procedure Law Amendment

作　　者：郭小冬[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学,天津300387

出　　处：《河北法学》2013年第8期93-103,共11页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：2012年《民事诉讼法修正案》第21条增加了诉讼中临时阻断侵害行为的规定。但是,仅仅因为一方的行为给另一方造成损害就准予保全的规定容易导致制度被滥用。立法应当充分认识到不同保全制度的特性以及它们给当事人带来的影响,在此基础上设置不同的审查机制。有关诉讼中临时阻断侵害行为的保全命令,只能在对申请人、被申请人和公共利益等各方利益进行权衡之后才能做出。In 2012, the article 21 of Civil Procedure Law amendment increases the provision of blocking to violations temporarily. However, it can easily lead to abuse of the system that giving permission of preservation just because of the damage haviour made by one party to another. The legislation should set a review mechanism＇based on the fully awareness of characteristics in different preservation system and their influence to the parties. The preservation command of blocking to violations temporarily in some cases should be made only after weighing the interests of all parties including applicant, respondent and the public.

关 键 词：行为保全 损害 难以弥补的损害 利益衡量 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]