检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁潇[1,2]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学行政法学院 [2]重庆行政学院,重庆400031
出 处:《河北法学》2013年第8期167-175,共9页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:《行政诉讼法》自颁布以来举步维艰,法院和当事人在制度表达和司法实践相互偏离的夹缝中寻求"变通",找到了更符合中国司法国情的"协同行政诉讼模式"。"协同诉讼"重新诠释诉讼价值,立足"案结事了"、追求"普遍正义"、重视"权利转化",通过"利益衡量"和救济法律的相互衔接,回应社会,力求在现有体制内更加能动地化解行政纠纷,完成和谐社会之目标。Court and the parties concerned in the system have to seek "workarounds" between the judicial practice and the law expression to found out the mode "cooperative administrative litigation mode" which according with the judicial situation of China well because the "administrative procedural taw" has been struggling since it was issued. "cooperative administrative litigation mode" reinterprets lawsuit value , aim for resolve the dispute, pursuit the" universal justice" attaches great importance to the " rights transformation" . Response to the social by "interest measurement" and join laws on relief to each other for resolving the administrative dispute more actively in the existing system and let the society more har- monious.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104