检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学经济与金融学院,西安710061 [2]西安市地方税务局,西安710061
出 处:《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第4期363-368,共6页Journal of Tianjin University:Social Sciences
摘 要:现阶段我国的创业投资企业存在着公司制和有限合伙制两种组织形态,从制度环境来看,公司制比有限合伙制更能适应我国当前的制度环境。但是在实践中,有限合伙制却越来越成为我国创业投资企业的主流组织形态,究其根本原因,是因为有限合伙制的低税负结构,而公司制创业投资的双重征税问题,引致了有限合伙制的比较优势。但是,税收制度本身只是一种制度的惯性,基于市场机制本身,并不能说明公司制比有限合伙制要落后。鉴于赋予公司制和有限合伙制公平竞争环境的考虑,文章建议针对公司制创投企业的税务比照有限合伙制,适当降低税务负担。Corporate system and limited partnership system are two morphology of venture capital enterprises in recent years, and, from the view of current institutional environment, corporate system would be more adaptive. However, in practice, the limited partnership has increasingly become the main form of organization for venture capital enterprises in China. The reason is that corporate system would with burden double taxation which lead to the disadvantage of company system. However, the tax system itself is an the inertia, As faras the market mechanism is concerned, there was no proof showing that corporate system is inferior to limited partnership. In view of the given considerations of fair competition envi- ronment for the corporate system and the limited partnership, the paper suggests that the tax burden on enterprises of corpo-rate system showld be reducad appropriately compared to their connterparts of limited partnership system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15