刑法中双重分类标准的谬误及修正  

The Falsehood and Revision of Double Classification Standard on Criminal Law

作　　者：郑飞[1] 许勇 

机构地区：[1]上海大学法学院,上海200444 [2]浙江省建德市人民检察院,浙江建德311600

出　　处：《河北法学》2013年第6期192-200,共9页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：上海市教委创新项目<组织犯刑事责任研究>(10YZ28)

摘　　要：双重标准是指在分类中同时把两个以上标准作为对属概念进行分类的依据。我国刑法中双重标准的错误使用,导致了种概念外延之和不能涵盖属概念外延、或者外延存在交叉的情况。我国刑法理论研究以及刑事立法中均存在采取双重标准进行分类的典型范例,如罪与非罪、作为与不作为、直接故意与间接故意、共同犯罪人种类、无过当防卫的适用范围等范畴。产生双重标准的根源在于价值理念的冲突,只有采取断然的二分法,才是解决概念不周延、分类不科学的根本办法。Double standard is referred to make a classification about generic concept based on more than two standards at the same time.Because of the misuse of double standard on the criminal law of our country,it has led to the extension of specific concept can＇t cover the extension of generic concept or the extension exists overlapping parts.The criminal law theory and criminal legislation of our country both have typical examples which adopted double standards,for example crime and noncrime,act or omission,direct intentional and indirect intentional,common crime types,the applicable scope of non-excessive defense and so on.The roots of producing double standard lied in the idea of value conflict,none but adopted flatly dichotom is the fundamental method to solve the problem of concept undistributed and classification unscientific.

关 键 词：双重标准 属概念 种概念 规范标准 

分 类 号：DF61[政治法律—刑法学]