检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王春梅[1] 叶玉龙[1] 刘跃云[1] 叶俊[2] 李承江 陈叙生[1]
机构地区:[1]四川省宜宾市农业科学院,四川宜宾644600 [2]四川省宜宾市江安县农业局,四川宜宾644600 [3]四川省宜宾市宜宾县农业局,四川宜宾644600
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2013年第15期6692-6693,6696,共3页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家茶叶产业技术体系项目
摘 要:[目的]评价非水溶性农药帕力特的药效。[方法]通过在四川省宜宾市2个不同地理区域的茶园小区中施用帕力特和对照药剂吡虫啉,比较了不同杀虫剂对假眼小绿叶蝉的田间药效。[结果]药后21 d内,在江安县和宜宾县均未见茶树出现生理毒害现象,且药后假眼小绿叶蝉数量急剧减少;宜宾县最佳防效达95.75%、最高虫口减退率达97.73%,显著好于对照药剂吡虫啉;江安县最佳防效达77.72%,最高虫口减退率达78.50%。[结论]使用非水溶性农药帕力特起到明显的药效作用,也提高了茶叶饮用安全,具有较强的市场推广潜力。[Objective] To evaluate efficacy of water insoluble pesticide parit.[Method] Through applying parit and control pesticide imidacloprid in tea gardens in different regions of Yibin City,the field efficacy of different pesticides on Empoasca cicadas was compared.[Result] The results showed that: 21days after application,there were no tea tree physiological poison phenomena on tea tree in Jiangan County and Yibin County,and Empoasca cicadas number drastically reduced;The best control efficiency is 95.75% and the strongest decline rate is 97.73% in Yibin County,significantly better than imidacloprid.The best control efficiency is 77.72% and the strongest decline rate is 78.50% in Jangan County.[Conclusion] The use of water insoluble pesticides parit has a significant pharmacodynamic effect,improve tea drinking safety with a strong marketing potential.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28