《新青年》主将的伦理意识与“五四”知识者的失位问题  

Ethical Consciousness of the Lords in New Youth and Dislocation Problem of the Scholars of May Fourth Movement

作　　者：冉华[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学新闻与传播学院,陕西西安710062

出　　处：《海南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2013年第4期101-106,共6页Journal of Hainan University （Humanities & Social Sciences）

基　　金：陕西师范大学研究生培养创新基金"二十世纪中国文学知识分子角色研究"(2013CXB014)

摘　　要：二十世纪中国的文化历程,自晚清思想与文学的觉醒起始,在"五四"新文学运动中勃兴,对中国传统文学与文化的态度之争终于达到高点。可无论在观念上如何取舍,参与新文化运动的《新青年》杂志同人总无法摆脱作为传统继承人的"人子"身份和未来引导者的"人父"身份。论题结合《新青年》杂志刊出的同人作品以及他们的回忆性文章,以思想与创作之间的相互关系为讨论的基点,进而发现他们"为人子"与"做人父"、"本为徒"与"实为师"等双重角色并构来思考和反思这一代人的知识问题,进而为知识分子问题做出历史性的反思并且抽象出其对当代的启示。China＇ s cultural course in the 20th century starts with the awakening of the thought and literature in the later Qing Dynasty, and prospers along with the New Literature Movement （ May Fourth Movement） when the argument over the attitudes toward the traditional Chinese literature and culture finally reaches its summit. However no matter what ideas are to be selected, the colleagues who participate in New Youth, a magazine in the New Culture Movement, cannot get rid of the ＂dutiful son＂ identity as the traditional successor as well as the ＂father＂ identity as the future guider. According to their works and reminiscent articles published in New Youth, this paper centers round the relationship between thought and creation, expounding and reflecting the knowledge problem of this generation by portraying the coexistence of double roles as both ＂the son of man＂ and ＂the father of a child＂, both ＂the supposed apprentice＂ and ＂the actual master＂ and so on while making the historical reflection on the issues of the intellectuals to find out the significance in the contemporary era.

关 键 词：《新青年》 同人 伦理 代际意识 知识者 失位 

分 类 号：G129[文化科学]