检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郝艳兵[1]
出 处:《西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第4期64-75,共12页Journal of Xidian University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:影响性诉讼在我国当前的法治实践中屡见不鲜,正确认识影响性案件的特点、种类、成因,掌握影响性案件的应对策略和裁判方法,对于促进裁判的可接受性具有重要意义。影响性诉讼从形成原因上可以划分为天然影响性诉讼和人为影响性诉讼。无论是天然影响性诉讼,还是人为影响性诉讼,司法机关都要审慎地识别和规避其中蕴含的消极影响,积极利用其中蕴含的法治创新因素促进个案积极影响的最大化。正确应对影响性诉讼,必须以追求法律效果和社会效果的统一为目标,以构建专业的司法和非专业的民意之间的沟通机制为路径,推动我国的司法迈向回应型司法。The impact litigations are very common in China's current judicial practice. To correctly understand the features, types, causes of impact litigations and to master the coping strategies and the judicial methods of the impact litigations are of great significance to promote the acceptability of the judgments. The impact litigation can be divided into natural and factitious impact litigation from the forming reasons. Whether natural or factitious impact litigation, judicial organs should carefully identify and avoid the implied negative impacts and actively take advantage of the implied law innovation factors to maximize the positive impact of the case. In order to correctly cope with the impact litigation, we must aim to the unification of the legal effect and social effect, build the communication mechanism between the professional justice and non-professional public opinion as the path, and push our judicature towards the responsive judicature.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15