检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李峰[1]
出 处:《科学学研究》2013年第8期1160-1164,共5页Studies in Science of Science
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究项目(10YJC630366)
摘 要:司法效能是衡量技术创新环境的重要指标,司法在多个层面发挥对技术创新环境的支撑作用,我国知识产权领域的司法改革虽有一定成就,但效率价值定位不明,没有针对技术领域和非技术领域的差异完善司法程序,纠纷解决形成司法路径依赖。通过现实问题分析和中外有关司法改革比较,提出深化司法改革、促进技术创新环境优化的对策。Judicial efficiency is an important index of measuring environment of technology, and judicature plays a supporting role of environment of technology at multiple levels. Although there are some achievements of judicial reformation about intellectual property in China, there still have some problems. Such as, position of value of efficiency is not clear; perfection of the judicial process isn' t aimed at the difference between technology and non -technology; dispute resolution only depends on the way of judicature. By analy- zing reality problems and comparing judicial reformation at home and abroad, suggest countermeasures about deepening judicial refor- mation and promoting optimization of environment of technology innovation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38