德日“诱惑侦查”的法律规制及其启示  

Some Opinions on the German and Japanese Legal Regulation of “the Police Entrapment” and Its Enlightenment——From the Enlightenment of the Theory and Related Legislation in Germany and Japan

作　　者：魏汉涛[1] 赵志福[1] 

机构地区：[1]昆明理工大学法学院,云南昆明650500

出　　处：《洛阳师范学院学报》2013年第9期39-43,共5页Journal of Luoyang Normal University

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区青年基金项目(12XJC820001);昆明理工大学引进人才项目(KKSY201224012)

摘　　要：诱惑侦查这种技术侦查手段在有效打击犯罪的同时,还潜存着侵犯公民人权与自由的巨大风险,有可能被滥用而陷无辜者于罪。我国有关诱惑侦查的规定不仅内容极少,而且存在不合理处。学界有关这方面的深入研究也严重不足。德国、日本适用诱惑侦查已有相当长的历史,并且学界进行了大量深入研究。受德国、日本相关立法及理论启示,我国在禁止犯意诱发型诱惑侦查的同时,还应授予被告人就犯意引诱进行无罪辩护的权利;严格限制机会提供型诱惑侦查,并从适用条件和法律后果两个方面对机会提供型诱惑侦查进行规制。Police entrapment is an effective means in crime detection, but it also has a huge risk to violate hu-man rights and freedom of citizens. This investigating method could be abused and could trap an innocent into sin. There are only few provisions about Police Entrapment in China of which there are unreasonable elements. Germany and Japan have had a long history to apply to Police Entrapment, and scholars had engaged in a large number of in- depth researches to this investigating method. Inspired by the legislations and doctrine about Police Entrapment in Germany and Japan, China should prohibit mens rea deceived and should grant defendants pleaded not guilty be- cause of mens rea deceived. At the same time, China should strictly limit opportunity deceived and regulate appli- cable conditions for this investigating method.

关 键 词：诱惑侦查 犯意引诱 机会提供型引诱 法律规制 

分 类 号：D908[政治法律—法学理论]