牙颌模型的三维激光扫描和多基线近景摄影测量的初步对比分析  被引量:2

Preliminary comparative analysis of the dental model of three-dimensional laser scanning and multi-baseline close-range photogrammetry

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:彭春[1] 宋锦磷[1] 邓锋[1] 刘庆华[1] 单春城[1] 

机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学附属永川医院,重庆402160

出  处:《激光杂志》2013年第4期82-83,共2页Laser Journal

摘  要:目的:比较三维激光扫描法和多基线数字近景摄影测量法在牙颌模型的三维测量中的差异方法采用20副标准理想颌牙颌石膏模型,由同一实验者在不同时间段,分别用两种方法进行三维成像和建模,并在计算机上重复两次标注测量标志点,测量设定项目数据,采用SPSS10.0统计学软件对测量数据进行对比分析。结果:两种测量方法的牙颌模型测量结果未见统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:多基线数字近景摄影测量法和三维激光扫描法均可满足牙颌模型的三维测量临床需求。虽然,激光扫描法精度上略高于多基线数字近景摄影测量法,但多基线数字近景摄影测量法所需设备少、价格低,更利于基层医院和口腔诊所普及使用。Objective: Comparison of 3D laser scanning method and multi - baseline digital close - range photogrmmnetry method in three - dimensional measuring dental model. Method: Using 20 pairs of standard ideal jaw dental plaster model, by the same in different time, two methods were used for 3D imaging and modeling, and the computer is repeated two timesannotation measure point, measure project data, comparative analysis of the measured data using SPSS10.0 statistical software. Resuh: Dental model measurement results of two methods for measurement of no statistical difference (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion: Multi- baseline digital close - range photogrammetry and 3D laser scanning method can meet the clinical needs of three- dimensional measuring dental model. Although, the accuracy of laser scanning method was higher than that of multi - baseline digital close - range photogrammetry, but digital close - range photogrammetry method multiple baseline needs less equipment, low price, more conducive to the grass- roots hospitals and dental clinic popularization.

关 键 词:牙颌模型 三维激光扫描 多基线数字近景摄影 测量 

分 类 号:TN241[电子电信—物理电子学] R783.5[医药卫生—口腔医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象