检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南省灵宝市第一人民医院心血管呼吸内科,河南灵宝472500 [2]河南省舞阳县人民医院骨外科,河南舞阳462400 [3]河南省舞阳县人民医院中医科,河南舞阳462400
出 处:《中国现代医生》2013年第24期159-160,共2页China Modern Doctor
基 金:河南省洛阳市科技进步二等奖(2007061-10)
摘 要:目的探讨缺血性卒中的进展与糖尿病史及入院血糖水平的关系。方法观察缺血性卒中住院患者共427例。根据本课题制定的缺血性进展型卒中标准,确定进展型卒中136例为进展组,非进展型卒中291例为对照组。检测统计入院血糖水平及有无糖尿病史。结果缺血性卒中两组间入院血糖水平差异有极显著统计学意义(P<0.01),有无糖尿病史的两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论缺血性卒中发生以后,应激性的血糖水平增高,是卒中进展的确切预测因子。而糖尿病虽然通过影响血管的器质及功能改变可以导致卒中,但不会导致卒中的进展,所以不是卒中进展的预测因子。Objective To explore the relationship between history of diabetes, blood glucose at admission and the progress of isehemic stroke. Methods Analyzed 427 cases of hospitalized patients with ischemic stroke based on the diagnostic criteria of progressive stroke, 136 cases of patients belonged to the progress group, while 291 cases of patients belonged to the control group. Recorded the blood glucose at admission and history of diabetes or no. Results There were significant differences between the two groups in blood glucose at admission (P 〈 0.01), and there was no significant difference between the two groups in having the history of diabetes or no (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion After the happening of ischemic stroke, irritable increase of blood glucose at admission was the definite predictive factor, and although diabetes can lead to stroke by influencing the vascular change of organ and function, but will not lead to the progress of stroke, so it' s not the predictive factor of the progress of stroke.
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.85