检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李雄[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学经济法学院
出 处:《中国法学》2013年第4期158-168,共11页China Legal Science
摘 要:我国在构建劳动争议"大调解"格局的主流语境下,正经历着在传统与现代、理论与实践、制度与经验之间如何取舍的纠结。同时,现有立法虽然对劳动争议调解制度有所规制,但无论是在价值理念上还是在制度设计上,都存在错位和偏差,从而导致现有制度尚不能满足日益增长并且日益复杂劳动争议解决的客观需要。改革之道首先在于正本清源,回归我国劳动争议调解制度的正当性及其价值功能,统领改革方向与思路;其次在于理性检讨我国劳动争议调解制度存在的若干深层次问题,把握制度投入的针对性与着力点;最后是从改革目标、根本保障、改革关键与当务之急等四个层面,全面实施我国劳动争议调解制度改革的"一揽子"配套方略。Under the mainstream context of establishing labor dispute "great mediation", China is facing a difficult choice between tradition and modern, theory and practice, and system and experiences. At the same time, although the current legislations regulate labor dispute in certain aspects, there are still mistakes and de- viation in both value idea and system design. Therefore, the current system cannot satisfy the objective re- quirements of solving increasing and complicated labor disputes. Therefore, we must reform radically. Firstly, the reform should return to focus on the legitimacy of labor dispute mediation system and its value function, and command direction and idea of reform; secondly, the underlying problems in labor dispute mediation sys- tem should be rationally reviewed ; and lastly, a series of general plans of reforming China's labor dispute me- diation system should be comprehensively implemented.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.9.170