检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶生魁[1]
出 处:《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年第4期75-78,共4页Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:陕西省教育厅科研计划项目:<说文拈字>研究(12JK0393)
摘 要:《说文拈字》是清代陕西安康学者王玉树撰写的一部文字学著作,其《考经篇》旨在根据《说文解字》引经恢复经文原本。从文献学视角看,《考经篇》对《说文解字》引经材料做了一定的考察,对于人们认识《说文解字》以及所引经典有参考价值。从文字学视角看,《考经篇》研究分析了《说文解字》引经用字与这些经典的今本用字之间的字际关系,对于认识这些文献异文有理论价值。《考经篇》的缺点在于考证简略,缺乏深入,偶有失误。Shuo Wen Nian Zi written by WANG Yu-shu(from An kang,in Shaanxi Province) in the Qing Dynasty is a philological work.As a part of it,Kao Jing Pian purposed to revert text on the basis of quotation from shuo wen jie zi.In the eye of text kao jing pian had researched shuo wen’s citation,and it had its reference value for some researchers.In the eye of philology kao jing pian had studied and analyzed on the relations between these quotation from shuo wen jie zi and sutra text.It has its theoretical value for understanding these text variant Characters.Certainly there were some deficiencies existed in it such as oversimplified analyses,wrong conclusion etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249