机构地区:[1]聊城山东聊城市第三人民医院,252000 [2]聊城市人民医院神经内科 [3]山东大学齐鲁医院脑血管病科
出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2013年第7期603-606,共4页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:国家“十一五”科技支撑计划课题项目(2006BA101A11)
摘 要:目的探讨颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)对腔隙性脑梗死患者认知功能的影响及相关危险因素。方法采用蒙特利尔认知评价量表(MoCA)、简易精神状态检查(MMSE)分别对43例腔隙性脑梗死患者颈动脉支架置人术前及术后1月、6月、1年、2年进行神经心理学测验,并与41例正常人比较。结果与对照组比较,治疗组患者MMSE评分在术前及术后1月、6月,MoCA评分在术前(19.39±2.17)分、术后1月(19.51±1.99)分,复制立方体在术前,交替连线测验、注意、延迟回忆在术前、术后1月,画钟在术前及术后1月、6月均明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05或P〈0.01)。与术前比较,治疗组患者MMSE、Mo—CA评分在术后6月、1年、2年,交替连线测验在术后2年,复制立方体、画钟在术后1年、2年,注意、延迟回忆在术后6月、1年、2年均明显升高,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05或P〈0.01)。在随访2年时Logistic回归分析表明,MoCA评分与患者年龄(OR=50.751,95%C11.407—19.464;P=0.006)、高血压(OR=8.012,95%CI1.212~27.550;P=0.042)、低教育水平(OR=11.586,95%CI 1.164—16.903;P=0.029)有相关性,与糖尿病、CAS无相关性。结论腔隙性脑梗死患者认知功能损害在CAS2年后明显改善,且以视空间功能、注意力、延迟回忆为著,但CAS不是认知功能的独立保护因素,高龄、高血压、低教育水平是其独立危险因素。Objective To explore the influence of the cognitive function and related dangerous factors in patients lacunar infarction(LI) after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods Neuropsychological tests ( MoCA and MMSE)were conducted in 43 patients with LI before CAS, 1 month,6 months, 1 year and 2 years after CAS and the scores were compared with those of 41 healthy cases. Results Compared with control group, in therapy group,MMSE scores before CAS, 1 month and 6 months after CAS ,MoCA scores before CAS(19.39 +2.17) and 1 month after CAS( 19.51 _+ 1.99) and the scores of Cube Copying before CAS,Alternating Trail Making Test,at- tention and delayed recall before CAS, 1 month after CAS and Clock Drawing before CAS, 1 month and 6 months after CAS all lowered obviously. There were statistical differences( P〈 0.05 or P 〈 0.01 ). Compared with before CAS, in therapy group, MMSE scores and MoCA scores 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after CAS, the scores of Alter- nating Trail Making Test 2 years after CAS, Cube Copying and Clock Drawing 1 year and 2 years after CAS and at- tention and delayed recall 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after CAS all increased obviously. There were statistical differences ( P 〈 0.05 or P〈 0.01 ). In the follow-up of 2 years ,the result of Logistic Regression Analysis showed that MoCA scores has correlation with age( OR = 50. 751,95% CI 1. 407 ~ 19. 464 ; P = 0.006), high blood pres- sure( 0R=8.012,95% CI1.212 -27.550; P=0.042)and low levels of education( OR= 11.586,95% CI1. 164 ~ 16. 903; P = 0.029)and no correlation with diabetes and CAS. Conclusion Cognitive impairment in patients with LI is improved 2 years after CAS, and visuospatial function, attention and delayed recall are significantly im- proved. But CAS is not independent protective factors for cognitive functions, and old age,low education levels and high blood pressure are independent risk factors for cognitive impairment in patients with LI.
关 键 词:颈动脉支架置入术 腔隙性脑梗死 认知障碍 神经心理学测验 LOGISTIC回归分析
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...