检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈珑[1] 彭李[1] 于永菊[1] 石磊[2] 陈星宇[2] 李静[1] 李嘉雯[1] 谢钧润[1] 李敏[1]
机构地区:[1]第三军医大学心理学院军事心理学教研室,重庆400038 [2]第三军医大学心理学院学员旅,重庆400038
出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2013年第7期636-639,共4页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31170994);军队“十二五”面上项目(CWS11J049);军队心理卫生科研课题(12XLZ-212)
摘 要:目的探讨军校医学生的情感风格特点及其与心理弹性、正负性情感和认知偏向的关系。方法采用情感神经科学人格量表(ANPS)、心理弹性量表(CD—RISC)、正负性情感量表(PANAS-C)和正负性认知偏向量表(APNIS)对某军医大学1014名在校本科生进行抽样调查。结果(1)军校医学生中,男女生在情感风格的恐惧和愤怒两因子得分上差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);军校环境适应程度不同的个体在情感风格的恐惧、愤怒、娱乐以及悲伤等因子得分上差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。(2)积极情感风格个体与消极情感风格个体在心理弹性、正负性情感、认知偏向上差异均具有统计学意义[(79.45±9.67)分,(34.95±5.07)分;(68.72±11.55)分,(29.82±6.21)分;P〈0.01]。(3)除关爱与正性自己相关不显著外,积极情感风格各因子与心理弹性、正性情感、正性他人、正性自己呈显著正相关(0.078≤r≤0.342,P〈0.05);除恐惧与负性情感相关不显著外,消极情感风格各因子与负性情感、负性他人、负性自己呈显著正相关(0.153≤r≤0.337,P〈0.05)。结论积极情感风格可能有利于个体心理弹性、正性情感和正性认知偏向的形成。Objective To identify the affeetive style characteristics and the relationships among affective style, resilience, positive and negative affect and cognitive attention in military medical students. Methods Affecrive Neuroseienee Personality Scale ( ANPS ) , Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale ( CD-RISC ) , Chinese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS-C) and Attention to Positive and Negative Information Scale (APNIS) were surveyed in 1014 military medical students. Results (1) Between male and female students, there existed significant difference in the scores of fear and anger (P〈 0.05 ). There existed significant difference in the scores of fear, anger, playfulness and sadness in students with different adaptation. (2) There were significant difference in resilience, positive and negative affect( 34.95 ± 5.07 vs 29.82 ± 6.22, P 〈 0.01 ), cognitive attention between positive and negative affeetive style group. ( 3 ) Positive affective style factors had an obvious positive correlation with resilience, positive affect ,positive/others and positive/self( 0.078 ≤ r ≤〈0.342, P〈 0.05 ), but not with caring and positive/self. Negative affective style factors had an obvious positive correlation with negative affect, neg- ative/others and negative/self(0. 153 ~〈 r ~〈0. 337, P〈 0.05 ) ,but not with anger and negative affect. Condnsion Positive affeetive style may be important predictor of resilience, positive affect and positive cognitive attention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30