检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《外语测试与教学》2013年第3期48-58,共11页Foreign Language Testing and Teaching
摘 要:本文基于Weir"基于证据的效度验证理论框架",结合教学大纲和考试大纲对听力理解的要求,提出一个针对高等学校应用能力考试A级(PRETCO-A)听力部分的具体效度验证框架。作者依照该框架从五个方面对该测试的效度进行了分析探究。在环境效度方面,从材料长度和朗读速度、话题、听力材料真实性、试题类型等方面进行分析;在基于理论效度方面,对试题所考查的语言知识进行分析;在评分效度方面,从项目分析和内部一致性角度进行讨论;在效标关联效度方面,验证不同年份听力部分成绩之间以及其与CET4听力部分成绩的相关性;在后果效度方面,通过问卷调查对考试的课堂教学反拨效应进行研究。Based on Weir's "evidence-based approach to validation" and with reference to teaching and testing sylla- bi of listening comprehension, the authors put forward a practical framework tbr the validation of listening section of Practical English Test for Colleges -- Level A (PRETCO-A) from five aspects. Context Validity was analyzed from text length and speech rate, topics and authenticity as well as task type. For Theory-based Validity, language knowl- edge was mainly examined. Scoring Validity was examined through item analysis and internal consistency. For Criteri- on-related Validity, correlation analyses with different versions of PRECTO-A Listening and that with the scores of CET4-1istening were used. As for Consequential Validity, the backwash effect on classroom teaching and learning was explored through questionnaire survey.
关 键 词:高等学校英语应用能力考试A级 听力理解 效度研究 基于证据的效度验证理论框架
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.74.222