检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赖鹏[1]
出 处:《云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版)》2013年第4期1-7,共7页Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Teaching & Studying Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition)
基 金:广州市哲学社会科学发展"十二五"规划2011年度课题(11Y02)
摘 要:汉语在情态动词句法方面的规则化程度不高,尤其是在推测型认识情态与非推测型根情态的句法区分方面体现出了规则上的诸多不一致。语法项目规则化程度低容易导致规则泛化之类的偏误,增加了习得难度。文章通过时体成分位置和否定词位置等方面的语法分析体现出两类情态在句法区分规则上的横向不一致性和纵向不一致性,并结合标记性理论对其标记性进行相应分析。Remarkable inconsistency can be found among the syntactic distinguishing rules for root and epistemic modality, which reveals some irregularity in terms of Chinese modal grammar. Irregu- larity in syntax may result in errors of overgeneralization. A syntactical analysis of the position of time/aspect particles and negative particles in modal sentences reveals inconsistency both cross-sec- tionally and longitudinally, which means that there is no consistent syntactic rule for differentiating the two kinds of modality. Marked with exceptions and irregularities, the distinguishing rules are ana- lyzed from the perspective of the Markedness Theory to account for difficulties in modal acquisition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222