检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学心理研究与咨询中心,成都610031 [2]西南大学心理学部,重庆400715
出 处:《四川理工学院学报(社会科学版)》2013年第3期87-91,共5页Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31200768);教育部人文社科项目青年基金研究(12YJC190014);中央高校基本科研业务经费专项资金(西南交通大学青年教师百人计划)项目(2682013BR069);四川省应用心理学研究中心项目(CSXL-122006)
摘 要:为编制适用于认知神经科学研究的大学生情绪形容词词库,69名大学生对267个情绪形容词的愉悦度、唤醒度、优势度和熟悉度在9点量表上进行等级评定。69名大学生在参加评定的一周内没有出现抑郁和焦虑情绪,总体上处于积极情感状态。结果显示:对情绪形容词评定结果的探索性因素分析表明,愉悦度是评定的主要成分,解释了59.42%的变异量。正性情绪形容词的愉悦度与唤醒度、熟悉度呈正相关,优势度与熟悉度呈正相关。负性情绪形容词的愉悦度与优势度、熟悉度呈正相关,优势度与唤醒度呈负相关。同时,正性、负性情绪形容词在愉悦度、唤醒度、优势度和熟悉度上存在显著的差异。This study aimed to build Chinese emotion adjective words system in undergraduates,which was applied to the experiments of cognitive neuroscience.267 Chinese 3-character emotion adjective words were rated by 69 participants with four emotional information dimensions(pleasure,arousal,dominance,and familiarity).The mood of 69 participants was positive without anxiety and depression.All dimensions were assessed by a 9-point rating scale.The results were shown as the following.The first,the pleasure factor was the principal constituent of the emotional information variance,and 59.42% of that for 3-character emotion adjective words was explained.The second,there were obvious differences between the correlation of pleasure,arousal,dominance,and familiarity in positive adjective words and that of the same four emotional information dimensions in negative adjective words.The third,there were differences between positive and negative emotion adjective words in the above four emotional information dimensions.
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90