检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《现代临床护理》2013年第7期74-76,共3页Modern Clinical Nursing
基 金:2012年广东省高等学校教学质量与教学改革工程本科类项目;项目编号为粤高教涵[2012]204号
摘 要:目的探讨小组合作教学法在妇产科护理实践教学中的应用效果。方法选取113名护理本科学生,在外阴清洁与消毒、阴道冲洗实践教学中分别采用传统教学法和小组合作教学法,比较两种教学法学生技能操作考核成绩的差异,并调查学生对小组合作教学法的评价情况。结果采用小组合作教学法的学生考核成绩优于采用传统教学法的学生,两者比较,P<0.001,差异具有统计学意义。89.4%以上学生赞成小组合作教学法。结论小组合作式学习能提高护理技能练习的效果,培养了学生团结合作精神,可在护理学主干课程的实践教学中推广应用。Objective To evaluate the effect of group cooperative learning on the experimental teaching of obstetrics and gynecology nursing.Methods We chose 113 undergraduate nursing students,using the traditional self-learning mode in the experimental teaching of cleaning and disinfection of the vulva and the group cooperative learning mode in the experimental teaching of vaginal douching.Their practical manipulations of the nursing skills by the two teaching modes were compared.A self-designed questionnaire was adopted to investigate the student's attitude to the group cooperative learning.Results The examination achievement by the group cooperative learning was better than that by the traditional self-learning,(Z=-4.986, P 0.001).89.4% of the students approved of the group cooperative learning.Conclusion The group cooperative learning may improve the effects of experimental training,contribute to the cooperative spirits of students,and also make full use of the human resources in teaching.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104