角膜裂伤合并虹膜脱出经前房眼内路径整复虹膜术疗效分析  被引量:2

Analysis the effect of iris repair via anterior chamber in the primary repair surgery for corneal perforating injury with iridoptosis

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:张卫红[1] 尚彦霞[1] 

机构地区:[1]河北省邢台市眼科医院眼外伤科,河北邢台054001

出  处:《中国实用眼科杂志》2013年第8期1039-1041,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology

摘  要:目的评价角膜裂伤合并虹膜脱出I期清创缝合术中经前房眼内路径整复虹膜的临床疗效。方法46例(46只眼)在I期手术中行角膜缘穿刺口,经该口进行前房内路整复虹膜的手术操作(A组)。32例(32只眼)在术中直接从角膜伤口整复虹膜(B组)。术后随访3-6个月。结果术后两组最佳矫正视力均明显提高,A组术后平均视力0.43±0.23,B组术后平均视力O.28±0.21,差异有统计学意义(f=2.67,P〈0.05)。A组I级虹膜复位37例(37/42占88.10%),B组I级虹膜复位11例(11/26占42.31%)。结论此手术方法安全有效,减少手术并发症,临床疗效优于传统直接从角膜伤口复侍女丁膜的方法,Objective To evaluate me errect pair surgery of corneal perforating injury with iridoptosis. Methods There were 46 cases adopted the method of corneal limbus incision in the primary repair surgery that iris repair was practiced via anterior chamber (group A). There were 32 cases adopted the method that iris repair was practiced via corneal wound directly (group B). They were followed-up for 3 to 6 months after surgery. Re- suits The best corrected visual acuity after operations of two groups was significantly improved. The average visual acuity was 0.43±0.23 of group A, and 0.28±0.21 of group B. There was a statistical- ly significant difference (P 〈0.05). The effective power of iris repair was 67.39% in group A, and 37.50% in group B. There also was statistically significant difference between the two groups (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions The method is effective and decreases the complications. The clinical efficacy is superior to the traditional method of iris repair via corneal wound directly.

关 键 词:角膜裂伤 虹膜脱出 前房路径 整复虹膜 

分 类 号:R779.1[医药卫生—眼科]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象