“奸臣”之名背后的赵文华  

Zhao Wenhua: behind the Name of “Treacherous Court Official”

作　　者：黄颖萍[1] 郭玉春[2] 

机构地区：[1]宁波大学人文与传媒学院,浙江宁波315211 [2]南开大学历史学院,天津300071

出　　处：《宁波教育学院学报》2013年第4期107-109,共3页Journal of Ningbo Institute of Education

摘　　要：正史中的赵文华依附权臣严嵩,在抗倭中诬陷张经、李天宠,贪污工部建设银,实为趋炎附势的奸佞小人。因此《明史》将其列入《奸臣列传》,盖棺定论,同时也将赵文华在文学、史学方面的才能湮没。不仅如此,后世史家也将其在抗倭战争中的独到见解论为毫无军事远见。然而,"奸臣"赵文华在文学和史学上造诣精深,在抗倭战争中也展现杰出的军事才能。Zhao Wenhua, in the authorized history, framed up Zhang Jing and Li Tianchong during the fighting against Japanese pirates, and corrupted the construction funds of the ministry of works in feudal China, was exactly a crafty time-server. So he was written in the ＂biography of treacherous court official＂ by the history of Ming Dynasty, with the final judgment, his talent in literature and historiography were also submerged. Moreover, the later historians also regarded his insightful views as none military vision during the fighting against Japanese pirates. However, the ＂traitor＂ Zhao Wenhua had profound attainments at literature and historiography, and who also showed his excellent military talent during the fighting against Japanese pirates.

关 键 词：奸臣 赵文华 才学 抗倭 

分 类 号：K248.2[历史地理—历史学]