检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邬砚[1,2]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120 [2]重庆市沙坪坝区人民法院,重庆400048
出 处:《现代法学》2013年第4期181-193,共13页Modern Law Science
摘 要:任何一种法律制度都预设了特定的主体模型作为其逻辑前提。我国《劳动合同法》在预设主体模型时,无论是对劳动者还是用人单位,均采取单一主体模型,这难免出现因模型的代表性不足导致规则的适用范围过宽,该法确立的诸多制度被基于不同主体的特殊属性被选择性适用的问题。要改变这种现状,必须对《劳动合同法》的主体模型进行重构,根据劳动者所处的不同阶层与所属的不同群体、用人单位的不同规模,对劳动者与用人单位进行类型化区分,进而开展不同的制度设计,即"建立多元主体模型,实施分类规制"。Any kind of legal system will build a specific subject model as its logical premise.When building the subject model,the Labor Contract Law adopts single subject model for both employers and employees,which is the reason for the lax application scope of the law due to the lack of the representativeness of the model.As a result,the systems based on the law are highly electively applied because of the special qualities of different individuals.In order to change the situation,the subject model of the Labor Contract Law has to be reconstructed,classifying employees and employers according to their different classes,groups and scales,developing different system designs,namely "building the multiple subject model,practicing classified regulation".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7