基于CNKI和WoS的中国物理学合作基金论文的比较研究  

Comparative Study Based on the Collaborative Fund Publications in Physics of China Published in CNKI and WoS

作　　者：田汇宝[1] 刘娅[1] 周萍[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学技术信息研究所,北京100038 [2]浙江大学公共管理学院信息资源管理系,杭州310058

出　　处：《情报杂志》2013年第8期104-108,80,共6页Journal of Intelligence

基　　金：国家自然科学基金"政府资助对知识生产作用的比较研究"资助(编号:71073153)

摘　　要：以中国知网(CNKI)和汤姆逊路透公司的Web of Science(WoS)收录的物理学学科的合作基金论文为研究对象,通过对合作类型多角度分析来对比中国在物理学领域的合作基金论文的分布情况。着重对合作基金论文的合作类型在资助类型和地区分布上进行比较研究。结果表明,合作基金论文在两个数据源上有不同的表现:CNKI的论文发表量先升后降,而WoS逐年上升;两个数据的合作优先顺序是一样的:国内机构内合作>国内跨机构合作>国际合作,其中CNKI的国际合作比例较少,而WoS比例为同期总量的1/5;北京地区依然在两个数据源的三种合作类型中占据明显优势,国内机构在参与国际合作的过程中具有高度的地域选择性;美国在国际合作中都能处于第一或第二的位置,表现比较稳定。Based on funded publications in Physics covered by China National Knowledge Infrastructure （ CNKI ） and Web of Science （ WoS ） of Thomson Reuters, the distribution of the co-funded publications in collaborative types has been explored from various perspec- tives. Comparative studies are mainly focused on the distribution of the collaboratively funded publications＇ collaborative types in terms of numbers of funds and area distribution. The trend of the publications published in the two databases has difference： the publications of CNKI are increased and then decreased, while the ones of WoS are yearly increased. The cooperation priority of the two databases is the same： One-agency collaboration （COL-I） 〉 Inter-agency collaboration { COL-H} 〉 International collaboration （ INTER-COL}. COL -I and COL-II have a dominant share in CNKI and the international collaboration takes tiny part, while the international collaboration takes 20% in WoS. Beijing takes the absolute lead in the three types of collaborations and three types of funds, meanwhile USA is in the first or second position in international collaboration. The choice of international collaboration partners is highly selective by domestic insti- tutions

关 键 词：基金论文 物理学 资助类型 合作类型 

分 类 号：G321.5[文化科学]