短跑运动员左膝关节等速力量康复训练研究  

A Study on the Rehabilitation Training of Sprinters Knee Isokinetic

作　　者：杨斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]商洛学院体育教学部,陕西商洛726000

出　　处：《商洛学院学报》2013年第4期83-87,共5页Journal of Shangluo University

基　　金：陕西省教育厅专项科研计划项目(2013JK0519);商洛学院科研基金项目(12SKY002)

摘　　要：通过ISOMED2000等速力量康复训练系统对10名患者左侧膝关节进行为期3周的康复训练后,研究发现:慢速60°/s角速度下,屈、伸肌训练结束后与第二周训练后相比表现出差异具有显著性(P<0.05),与训练前及第一周训练后相比差异具有极显著性(P<0.01);中速120°/s角速度下,屈肌训练结束后与训练前、第一周及第二周训练后相比均表现出差异具有显著性(P<0.05),伸肌与之相比差异具有极显著性(P<0.01);快速240°/s角速度下,屈肌训练结束后与训练前、第一周及第二周训练后相比均表现出差异具有显著性(P<0.05),伸肌与训练前及第一周训练后相比差异具有极显著性(P<0.01),但伸肌与第二周训练后相比仅表现出差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。With ISOMED2000 isokinetic rehabilitation training system, the sprinter＇s left side of the knee joint were under observation for three weeks. With angular velocity of 60/s, the observation result in the second week （P〈0.05）is more obvious than the first week （P 〈0.01） after the conclusion of the Flexor and extensor training. With angular velocity of 120/s, the results in both the first and second week display obvious distinction （P〈0.05）after the conclusion of the Flexor training, while extensor training shows more distinctive changes （P〈0.01）. With angular velocity of 240/s, compared to the first and second week, the result shows that Flexor displays disparity after the conclusion of the training（P〈0.05）. In addition, compared to the first week＇s training, extensor shares more obvious changes （P 〈0.01） , while extensor merely shows changes after the second week＇s training.

关 键 词：短跑运动员 膝关节损伤 等速运动 康复训练 

分 类 号：G254.3[文化科学—图书馆学]