检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西百色市人民医院肝胆胃肠外科,533000
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2013年第4期388-390,共3页The Practical Journal of Cancer
摘 要:目的探讨D3淋巴结清扫术对进展期胃癌患者的疗效。方法对96例进展期胃癌患者分别行D2、D3淋巴结清扫术。结果观察组和对照组术后1~3年生存率比较无差别,但4、5年生存率对照组分别为56.3%和39.6%,观察组分别为64.6%和52.1%,两者比较有明显差异(P<0.05)。对照组和观察组术中出血量、术后住院时间、并发症发生率和淋巴结转移率比较无明显差异(P>0.05),但对照组手术时间[(185±20)min]明显短于观察组[(224±25)min](P<0.05)。在生活质量评估方面,对照组和观察组各项特殊症状评分指标比较差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。结论进展期胃癌行D3淋巴结清扫术是安全的,能够显著改善患者的预后且不影响生活质量。Objective To study the influence of D3 lymph node dissection on prognosis of gastric carcinoma. Methods 96 patients with advanced gastric carcinoma were subjected to D2 or D3 lymph nod dissection. Results No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in the 1 -to 3-year survival rates(P 〉 0.05 ). But the 4-and 5-year survival rates of Group D2 were significantly lower than th^se of Group D3 ,which was 56.3% vs 64.6% ,39.6% vs 52. l% ,respeetively(P 〈0.05 ). The bleed- ing amount, hospital duration, complication rate and lymph node metastasis rate of the 2 groups had no significant ( P 〉 0.05 ). The operation time of D2 was shorter than D3, ~ ( 185 +- 20 ) rain I vs [ ( 224 +_ 25 ) rain ], P 〈 0.05. There was no significant differ- ence in qualily of lit~ between the 2 groups. Conclusion D3 lymph node dissection is safe to patients with advanced gastric car- cinoma, and it can improve the prognosis effectively without affecting quality of life.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117