检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于洪霞[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学教育学部教育管理学院,100875
出 处:《经济研究》2013年第8期68-80,共13页Economic Research Journal
摘 要:由于终身收入难以获得,在实证分析中以当期收入替代终身收入是研究领域的普遍做法,有研究表明这种替代会造成生命周期偏误,在估计教育收益率的过程中,生命周期偏误可能是比内生性偏误更严重的问题。本研究将对以当期收入估计的中国教育收益率进行元分析,对其中可能存在的生命周期偏误进行评估,对教育收益率的长期变动趋势进行再认识。结果表明,现有研究得到的我国教育收益率增长趋势,可能有很大一部分要归因于人口老龄化导致的样本平均年龄增长。As the data of lifetime earnings is difficult to obtain, a common practice in the literature is applying current income instead of lifetime earnings, and life-cycle bias emerges because current income is not parallel to lifetime earnings. When we estimate the returns to education, the life-cycle bias may be a more serious problem than the endogenous bias on which researchers have paid much attention. This paper conducts a recta-analysis to investigate how life-cycle bias could influence the estimates of returns to education and their time tendency in China. The result suggests that life-cycle bias is serious and a large part of the growth of returns to education in China is due to sample average age growth caused by an aging population.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.26