论行政诉讼起诉期限制度的完善——兼谈我国《行政诉讼法》的修改  被引量:13

On Perfection of Prosecution Time Limit System of Administrative Litigation——Concurrently Talking About Administrative Procedure Law Modification

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:林俊盛[1,2] 

机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院 [2]广东省高级人民法院行政庭

出  处:《行政法学研究》2013年第3期26-30,137,共6页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

摘  要:我国现行立法关于起诉期限的规定具有撤销诉讼一体主义的特征,未来应从诉讼类型的角度完善行政诉讼规则,从而完善包括起诉期限在内的时效规定。具体而言,撤销诉讼继续适用现行立法规定的起诉期限;由于拒绝行为产生的给付诉讼也应当适用起诉期限的规定,而消极不作为给付诉讼可以考虑适用公法上请求权的消灭时效(诉讼时效)或者权利失效制度予以规范;确认诉讼不需要规定起诉期限,而是通过诉的利益和确认诉讼的补充性规则防止原告滥用诉权。Considering the prosecution time limit regulations, there is the feature of revocation litigation unanimism in China's current legislation. So the future administrative procedure law should be perfected from the litigation type angle, including the time limit regulations such as the prosecution time limit. Specifically, the existing regulations should be applied to the revocation litigation and the prestation litigation due to refusal actions. And the limitation of action or the vetavirkung system in the public law may be considered for the prestation litigation due to negative omissions. Moreover, no time limit should be set for the confirming litigation because litigation interests and related supplementary rules should be confirmed to prevent the plaintiff from abusing the right of litigation.

关 键 词:行政诉讼 起诉期限 诉讼类型 

分 类 号:D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象