检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李脉[1] 周黎明[1] 孙亦婷[1] 赵雅云[1] 夏爱丽[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江省宁波市妇女儿童医院生殖中心,宁波315000
出 处:《生殖医学杂志》2013年第9期658-662,共5页Journal of Reproductive Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨激光透明带削薄技术对冻融胚胎移植(FET)临床结局的影响,并分析不同年龄段患者临床结局的差异。方法回顾性分析603例FET周期,根据胚胎移植前是否行激光透明带削薄,分为辅助孵化组(AH组)与非辅助孵化组(非AH组),并分别按年龄段分为<35岁组及≥35岁组,观察AH对冻融胚胎的着床率、临床妊娠率、流产率、活产率及多胎率的影响,并比较不同年龄段的临床结局差异。结果 AH组与非AH组的着床率、临床妊娠率、流产率、活产率及多胎率分别为26.5%vs.26.8%、46.8%vs.41.7%、6.8%vs.3.8%、36.8%vs.34.9%及24.4%vs.29.3%,其中AH组的着床率、临床妊娠率、流产率、活产率与非AH组的差异均无显著性差异(P>0.05);<35岁组及≥35岁组的着床率与临床妊娠率无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论采用激光透明带削薄技术并不能改善FET的临床结局。Objective: To investigate the effects of laser-assisted zona thinning technique on the clinical outcomes frozen thawed embryo transfer(FET). Methods: The data of 603 patients after FET were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into assisted hatching (AH) group and none-AH group according to whether underwent laser-assisted zona thinning. Then the two groups were subdivided into 〈35 years group and ≥35 years group according to their age. The rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, abortion, live birth and multiple pregnancy were statistically analyzed. Results: The rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy,abortion rate,live birth and multiple pregnancy in two groups were 26.5% vs. 26. 8%, 46. 8% vs. 41.7%,6.8% vs. 3.8%,36.8% vs. 34.9%,24.4% vs. 29.3% respectively. There were no significant differences in the rates of implantation. The clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in AH group were higher than those in none-AH group,but there was no significant difference (P〉0.05). Conclusions: The results suggest that laser-assisted zona thinning technique has no beneficial effect on implantation and clinical pregnancy outcomes of FET.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229